POSTSCRIPT: BOB LAZAR ANALYZED
By Steve Douglass
So, Bob Lazar—he’s the guy who came out in the late ’80s saying he worked on alien spacecraft at Area 51. Sounds wild, right? Even some of my closest friends believe Bob.
To be truthful, never et the guy. I've never had the opportunity to look him in the eye and ask, "Prove to me it's true."
But here’s why a lot of people are skeptical about his story, including me:
1. School claims don’t check out
He says he got degrees from MIT and Caltech. Problem is… there’s no record of him at either place. No transcripts, no classmates, no professors. People sometimes try to excuse it with “the government erased everything,” but realistically, erasing decades of university records and everyone’s memories? That’s a tall order.
2. Physics explanations are messy
He talks a lot about gravity, antimatter, and a mysterious “Element 115.” But physicists who’ve looked at his explanations say he often mixes up terms or hand-waves concepts. Basically, it reads like someone who knows enough to sound smart but not enough to actually make the math work.
3. Element 115 doesn’t behave like he says
He claimed it was stable and could power alien ships. The real element (Moscovium) exists now, but all isotopes decay in milliseconds. So the stuff he described… doesn’t match reality. No one’s been able to replicate it.
4. His story shifts a bit over time
Over decades of interviews, timelines, job titles, and details about Area 51 have subtly changed. That doesn’t scream “lie,” but real witnesses to insane events usually get more precise, not blurrier.
5. Employment isn’t as fancy as he claims
He did work at Los Alamos—but as a contractor technician, not a physicist or top-secret engineer. Directories and newspaper blurbs make him sound more official than he actually was.
6. No big predictions or testable claims
A lot of legit whistleblowers leave trails you can check or discoveries they hint at. Lazar? Nothing that led to new technology, experiments, or verifiable breakthroughs.
7. “They erased everything” is hard to believe
Think about it—erasing all your school, employment, tax, housing, and third-party records without leaving a trace? The government has a hard time keeping even small projects secret; wiping out an entire personal history? Not realistic.
Honestly, the idea that Lazar saw real military experiments, not aliens, fits really well.
Think about Area 51’s job. It’s not there to test normal planes. It’s where they fly the stuff that’s so weird-looking they don’t want anyone to understand it yet. That alone sets the stage for UFO stories.
Now add plasma experiments into the mix.
Plasma can glow, change colors, look like it’s “solid,” move strangely, and even mess with radar. At night, in the desert, with no sound? That’s basically a UFO starter kit. You don’t need aliens at all.
So imagine Lazar watching something like that:
A glowing object
No visible engine
Weird movement
Maybe hovering or darting suddenly
If you don’t know it’s a plasma effect or EM test, your brain is going to reach for the wildest explanation available — especially in the late ’80s when UFO culture was everywhere.
The “flying saucer” shape also isn’t that mysterious. If you’re testing fields, energy, or containment, you’d naturally use simple, symmetrical shapes. Discs just work for that kind of thing. Smooth, balanced, no obvious front or back.
Here’s where Lazar probably goes wrong, though.
He likely wasn’t some top physicist reverse‑engineering alien tech. More like someone on the edge of a project. He sees pieces, not the whole picture. No one sits him down and says, “Here’s exactly what this is and why it behaves that way.”
So he fills in the blanks.
Plasma + secrecy + limited understanding + UFO lore =
“Yeah… this must be alien.”
And once that idea clicks, everything starts getting interpreted through that lens. The power source becomes “Element 115,” the weird motion becomes “anti‑gravity,” and the secrecy becomes proof instead of a warning sign.
The funny part? The government wouldn’t rush to correct him. Letting people say “aliens” is actually convenient. It sounds crazy, it scares off serious scrutiny, and it keeps real adversaries guessing about what’s actually being tested.
So yeah — Lazar probably:
Saw something genuinely strange
Assumed it was way more exotic than it was
Built a story around that assumption
Then stuck with it for decades
Unknowingly part of a Cold War PsyOp
Not totally making it up… but not telling you what he thinks he’s telling you either.
So, let’s really strip this down and just talk it through like normal people.
If you look at Lazar through a Cold War lens, the whole thing starts to feel way less mysterious and way more… human.
Back then, the US military lived on deception. Confusing the Soviets was a feature, not a bug. If you could make the other side waste time, money, or brainpower chasing ghosts, that was a win.
Now imagine Bob Lazar shows up.
He’s smart, but not elite.
He likes to talk.
He likes to feel important.
He’s clearly impressed by secrecy and mystery.
That’s not an insult — that’s just a type. And intelligence agencies are very good at spotting that type.
So instead of saying, “This guy’s a risk, get rid of him,” someone might’ve thought:
“Actually… this guy could be useful.”
They don’t need to sit him down and say, “You’re part of a disinformation program.” That’s not how this stuff works. You just show him something weird, give him no context, and let his imagination do the rest.
Maybe he sees:
A strange test craft
Plasma glowing around something
A mock‑up or decoy
A test flight that looks nothing like a normal plane
No explanation. No correction. Just silence.
At that point, the story basically writes itself.
And once he starts talking about aliens, it’s perfect. Because now:
Serious people stop listening
Skeptics laugh it off
The public is entertained
Foreign intelligence has to wonder if any of it is real
That uncertainty alone is valuable.
And notice something important:
No one ever really shuts him up.
If he were leaking real secrets, he’d be in serious trouble. Instead, he’s kind of… allowed to exist. Mocked, debated, ignored, but never fully crushed. That’s exactly what you’d expect if his story is useful noise.
From Lazar’s side, it probably feels totally genuine. He saw things that didn’t make sense. No one explained them. The secrecy was real. So “aliens” becomes the simplest explanation that ties it all together.
He doesn’t have to be lying. He just has to be wrong in an interesting way.
So yeah — the theory that he was shown “saucers” on purpose, knowing he’d talk, fits way better than:
A massive alien cover‑up
Perfect record erasure
Or him being a super‑secret physicist
It’s just Cold War mind games + human nature.
Honestly, the biggest reason he sticks to his story is: there’s no way out of it anymore.
Once you tell the world something that big — “I worked on alien spacecraft” — you can’t really walk that back without blowing up your whole life. If he ever said, “Yeah, I was wrong,” he wouldn’t just be correcting a mistake. He’d be admitting he misunderstood everything that made him famous.
That’s a hard thing for anyone to do.
Over time, the story also stops feeling like a claim and starts feeling like a memory. When you tell the same story for 30+ years, your brain kind of locks it in. It feels solid. Questioning it feels like questioning your own past.
There’s also the pride thing. Not in a cartoon‑villain way — just human pride. Admitting, “I got fooled” or “I wasn’t as important as I thought” hurts way more than saying, “The government is lying.” One of those protects your self‑image. The other wrecks it.
And then there’s the audience.
For every skeptic calling him out, there’s someone saying:
“You’re brave”
“You’re telling the truth”
“You were silenced”
That support reinforces everything. It makes sticking to the story feel justified, even necessary.
Plus — and this part matters — there’s zero upside to changing it.
If he recants, skeptics won’t suddenly respect him. Believers will feel betrayed. Media attention disappears. He becomes “the guy who made it all up” instead of “the guy who knows something.”
So why would he?
And the thing is, he might not think he’s lying at all. He probably genuinely believes what he says. He saw something weird, filled in the gaps early, and never had a reason — emotionally or practically — to rethink it.
So yeah, he sticks to it because:
It’s his identity
His memories are wrapped around it
Backing out would be painful and pointless
And believing it is easier than unraveling it
No evil genius required. Just a very human response to being stuck inside your own story for decades.
This is actually the part people miss, because even if Lazar is wrong, his story still matters.
Not in a “he proved aliens” way. More in a “this tells us something important about how secrecy and humans interact” way.
First, his story shows how secrecy creates myths. When the government hides stuff (for legit reasons), people don’t just shrug and move on. They fill in the blanks. Lazar is a perfect example of what happens when someone sees a slice of something secret with no context — the story grows way bigger than the reality.
Second, he basically helped create modern UFO culture. Before Lazar, UFO stories were mostly lights in the sky and abductions. After him, suddenly everyone’s talking about reverse‑engineering, black sites, propulsion systems, elements, hangars. Whether true or not, he reshaped the conversation.
Third, his story shows how disinformation can work without anyone “lying.” If the theory is right that he saw real but misunderstood tech, then no one had to fake aliens. They just let the confusion run. That’s powerful — and kind of unsettling — because it means misinformation doesn’t always come from bad actors. Sometimes it comes from incomplete truth.
It also matters because it’s a cautionary tale about credibility. Once a story gets popular, evidence stops mattering as much as consistency. Lazar teaches us how easily confidence can replace proof — and how hard it is to unwind that once people emotionally buy in.
And honestly? It matters because it keeps us grounded. His story reminds us to be skeptical without being cynical. You can say, “Something weird happened,” without jumping straight to aliens or assuming everyone involved is lying.
So yeah — Bob Lazar matters not because he proved anything, but because:
He shows how legends are born
He shows how secrecy backfires
He shows how people get trapped in narratives
And he shows how easily mystery becomes belief
Even if aliens never enter the picture, that lesson is still worth paying attention to.
There's a lot more info about Bob Lazar on Tom Mahood's website: BLUEFIRE
POSTSCIPT: His story is going to get further amplified by the Bob Lazar "S4" movie due out soon. Check out this link on FORBES. It will be interesting to see where this documentary goes. UAPs are a money-making topic right now. Heck, the Lazar saga has practically made George Knapp's career.
Will this "documentary" be another cash grab with them only perpetuating the myth, the man, the legend or will they do some honest skeptical inquiry into Bob's claims?
Keep in mind, a movie about a guy who believes he worked on UFO's at Area 51 is a lot sexier than a story about a guy who may have made the whole thing up or was an unknowing part of a Cold War PsyOp. Only time will tell.
TO BE CONTINUED
Comments
Post a Comment